This week we're digging in on healthcare.
Thirty days of polling land on a single point: the insured are no longer spared. Nine in ten say costs are too high. Two-thirds say they've delayed care because life felt too overwhelming or too expensive. A third are now making real sacrifices — skipping meals, cutting utilities, borrowing — to keep up with medical bills. When the pain gets that broad, the politics get strange. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents are suddenly agreeing on things, and the agreement runs through Medicaid, price transparency, and "please stop making this harder."
Skipping Care Is the New Normal
The Pollfish survey of 2,500 insured Americans is the rare poll where the headline finding is not the most damning one. Yes, nearly 90% call their costs excessive. Yes, 36% report healthcare affordability kept them up at night. But the number that should stop policymakers cold is this: of the 44% who delayed care, 45% say their condition got worse as a result. That's the cost of the cost crisis, measured in outcomes rather than vibes.
The trend line is getting worse fast. KeyBank's consumer survey found the share of Americans naming healthcare as a top financial concern jumped 8 points in a single year, from 22% to 30% — the sharpest single-year increase of any expense category they track. Gallup puts the sacrifice rate at a third of Americans cutting something else to pay for care. KFF finds healthcare costs have now pushed past food, housing, utilities, and gas as Americans' top economic worry, with 62% of Democrats, 58% of independents, and 46% of Republicans all expecting their costs to rise in the next year.
The constructive read: bipartisan pain is bipartisan permission. A problem this widely felt gives policymakers rare political cover to move on things — price transparency, catastrophic coverage, ACA subsidy extensions — that normally die in partisan crossfire.
The Medicaid Fight Goes Local
The national Medicaid debate is getting most of the oxygen, but the state-level polling this month shows where the actual political action is — and it's even more lopsided than the federal picture.
In North Carolina, Shumaker & Jackson found 95% of registered voters call Medicaid important for healthcare access, with Republicans, Democrats, and unaffiliated voters all clustered within a point of one another. In Maryland, Opinion Works measured 85% saying Medicaid matters to their community, and 67% opposing Trump administration rule changes that could push roughly 130,000 Marylanders off coverage. In Nebraska — a deep-red state — Holland Children's Institute found 81% of voters want the legislature to close tax loopholes before cutting healthcare, education, or workforce programs. Across red, blue, and purple states alike, support for Medicaid is running at consensus levels you rarely see on any other domestic policy issue.
In Nebraska, healthcare costs (66%) now outrank rent and mortgage payments (51%) as voters' top financial worry. In a deep-red state. During a housing affordability crisis.
But the exception that proves the rule is in Los Angeles, where Sextant Strategies found Measure ER — a half-cent sales tax to replace $2.4 billion in federal Medi-Cal cuts — splitting almost evenly at 47% opposed and 45% in favor. Even LA Democrats back it only 55%–37%. Protecting Medicaid is broadly popular. Paying a new tax to protect it, during a cost-of-living crunch, is not. Activists looking to backfill federal cuts at the ballot box should treat that gap as the most important state-level problem of the year.
The Screening Squeeze: Cost Fear Catches Cancer Fear
Atomik Research's screening survey — 7,510 adults — documents something genuinely new: 34% of Americans who worry about routine cancer screenings now cite cost as their concern, up from 25% a year ago. That's statistically level with the share who fear being diagnosed with cancer. People are as scared of the screening bill as they are of the diagnosis it might reveal.
Dig into what cost anxiety actually means for these respondents and it gets more interesting. Among those who cite cost as a barrier, 50% worry about the screening or appointment itself, 14% about follow-up care costs, and 12% about lost income or missing a work shift. Cost fear isn't just the sticker price — it's a bundle of downstream costs that get priced in before anyone even makes the appointment. Layer on distrust: 19% of adults behind on screenings cite skepticism of the healthcare system as a reason, and of those, 49% believe the system prioritizes profit over patients. 50% say predictable, affordable pricing would increase their trust in the system overall — suggesting the cost anxiety is doing double duty as a trust signal, not just a line item.
The Abbott / Kantar chronic disease survey of 4,000 Americans finds the same dynamic in the broader prevention space: 74% believe most chronic diseases are preventable, but only 1 in 4 feel confident they know how to manage their health. 65% say they've delayed or avoided a health action because it felt too overwhelming or too expensive. 46% say health guidance is actively confusing — 58% of those blame conflicting advice from different sources.
This Week's Shorter Stories
This week Poll Vault tracked 34 healthcare polls — see them all →
Mail-order abortion pills under scrutiny. The 85 Fund / SBA Pro-Life America poll shows ~70% of likely voters — including 66% of Democrats and 69% of women — support reinstating the pre-COVID in-person medical evaluation requirement for mifepristone. Advocacy-commissioned with informational prompts, so weight accordingly.
Iowa says no to vaccine rollbacks. Victory Enterprises found 73% of Iowa likely voters oppose HF 2171, which would end school immunization requirements. In a GOP-leaning electorate, that's a supermajority — and it's the clearest signal this month that childhood vaccine consensus is holding.
Patients pre-process with AI. Zocdoc's poll of 2,186 Americans and Rock Health's 8,000-person study both find AI reshaping the pre-visit research phase — symptom checking, interpreting test results, comparing treatment options — while patients still want their doctor leading diagnosis and care once they're in the room. AI users also arrive more informed and more willing to share their data with big tech platforms.
A quiet cultural shift. A Pew Research Center study of 8,937 adults finds 63% of Americans say physician-assisted death is morally acceptable (34%) or not a moral issue (29%). Religious intensity, not denomination, is the strongest predictor — 76% of Catholics say it's permissible or irrelevant despite church doctrine. As more states legalize medical aid in dying, unified national opposition looks unlikely.
Mental health, one tap away. The Bipartisan Policy Center found 3 in 10 adults have used a self-guided digital mental health tool, rising to nearly 50% of 18–44-year-olds. 70% of users cite comfort over in-person care; half cite lower cost. Rural users report the highest satisfaction but the lowest adoption — a broadband problem wearing a healthcare mask.
Workforce on the edge. CENTEGIX found 68% of healthcare workers personally experienced workplace violence in the past year and 74% witnessed it, yet only 36% received both safety training and drill practice. 54% say staff safety now factors into whether they'll take or keep a job — a recruiting problem hiding inside a safety problem.
NIH cuts, one year later. MassINC's survey of researchers with disrupted grants found only 35% had funding fully restored by end of 2025. 42% canceled planned research, 47% paused experiments, and 29% of tenure-track scientists have applied for jobs elsewhere. Of the ~75% who sought alternative funding, just 1% got what they needed. The pipeline damage is structural.
What to Watch
ACA subsidy extensions. The KFF data makes clear the cost pressure isn't receding. Whatever Congress decides on premium tax credits will ripple through employer benefit design and Marketplace enrollment immediately.
State budget fights. Watch Nebraska, Maryland, and North Carolina for ballot-level action on Medicaid protection. The Maryland drug-ad tax is the most interesting funding mechanism quietly moving.
LA Measure ER. A healthcare tax losing in Los Angeles would be the loudest warning yet that cost-of-living anxiety overrides healthcare affinity at the ballot box.
Cancer screening communication. Atomik's data frames cost fear as a trust problem as much as an affordability one. Watch whether providers and insurers respond with clearer patient-facing pricing on preventive care.
What Else We Tracked This Week
- 60% of NJ Adults Struggle With Healthcare Costs — Eagleton / SSRS
- Most Americans Fear Retirement Healthcare Costs but Lack a Plan — D.A. Davidson / Big Village
- Eight in Ten Americans Expect High Healthcare Costs in Retirement — Big Village
- Three in Four NC Voters Highly Concerned About Healthcare Costs — Strategic Partners Solutions
- Voters Overwhelmingly Back Price Transparency — McLaughlin & Associates
- Health Plan App Usage Rises for Commercial, Falls for Medicare Advantage — J.D. Power
- Financial Strain and Staffing Gaps Keep Patient Access Out of Reach — Experian Health
- COVID-19 Vaccination Among Healthcare Workers Jumps but Stays Below 50% — CDC
Until next time, Alex Lundry
Due Data is powered by Poll Vault. Get the full data behind every poll mentioned above.
Want the full data behind every poll mentioned above?
Create free account →